About Reviews Purchase

New York Post
September 26, 2004

Going Nuclear: Terror's Next Way
By: Charles E. Schumer

The terrorists who attacked this nation on 9/11 demonstrated a willingness to take the lives of innocent Americans with a calculated assault, limited only by the means and weapons available to them.

If terrorists had full nuclear capabilities at that time, the United States might have been the world's first victim of a massive-scale nuclear terrorist attack. As Graham Allison outlines in his book, "Nuclear Terrorism," the most devastating attack we can conceive of would be nuclear.

Allison presents a full discourse on the very real threat of nuclear terror and delivers the thesis of his book convincingly. The frightening fact is that a nuclear terrorist attack in the next decade is more likely than not, and the world hasn't yet recognized that nuclear terror is in fact, preventable.

Allison lays out the situation: The terrorist groups, like al Qaeda and Chechen separatists, most likely to acquire nuclear materials; what kinds of weapons could be produced; where the nuclear bomb could originate, and how a nuclear weapon would be delivered.

The first half of Allison's book leads the reader to disheartening conclusions about the threat of nuclear terror, while the second half is fully devoted to a strategic plan of prevention.

First, he suggests, the "Three No's": No loose nukes, no new nascent nukes and no new nuclear weapons states.

Allison suggests that all insecure nuclear weapons and materials be rounded up. This presents a major challenge, as he observes there are possibly 200 locations around the world where nuclear weapons or materials could be acquired. He specifies Russia as the most dangerous; 90 percent of nuclear material not in the United States can be found there.

His second tactic, calling for no new nascent nukes, would stop the building of any facilities for produing nuclear-bomb-making materials, like enriched uranium. Lastly, drawing the line at the current eight nuclear powers is an absolute must. He maintains that if the first two objectives - no loose nukes and no new nascent nukes - are successfully met, the birth of new nuclear states would be impossible.

Allison follows the "Three No's," with a plan for "Seven Yeses," which include: the prevention of nuclear terrorism as an absolute national priority; fighting a strategically focused war on terrorism; a humble foreign policy; building a global alliance against nuclear terrorism; creating intelligence capabilities required for success in the war on nuclear terrorism; dealing with dirty bombs and constructing a multi-layered defense. He strongly emphasizes that success depends on credible intelligence reports.

I have the highest respect for Allison's academic work and his service as assistant secretary of Defense for Policy and Plans in the 1990s, when he coordinated Defense Department strategy and policy toward Russia, Ukraine and the other states of the former Soviet Union. In fact, a year ago this week, I met in New York with Russian Premier Vladimir Putin, who emphatically told me that Russia wanted to be part of our global alliance against terrorism.

But a lot has happened since I met with Putin and - I suspect - since Allison finished this excellent book. Most important, the unconscionable terrorist acts against the Russians by Chechens raise serious doubt that all nuclear materials can be rounded up.

Allison does discuss the United States strengthening its borders, especially our ports. (Some 96 percent of cargo containers that enter the United States are not screened for radiological or biological agents.) But I give this a higher priority than he does. Even the detection devices we have are not proficient and can only detect nuclear material at relatively close range.

Scientists at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island say devices could be developed that detect nuclear materials from 70 or 80 feet away and more accurately. We could place these detection devices on every crane that loads containers bound for the United States in the 15 ports worldwide from which we accept freight.

With the right investment, we could prevent any nuclear weapon from being smuggled into the country, and this method, which Alison doesn't emphasize strongly enough, would seem to have the best chance for successful prevention.

Before 9/11, it was almost unthinkable that our country was susceptible to nuclear terrorism, but reality has since shifted. The security of the world depends on who can move faster: the terrorists trying to acquire nuclear weapons and materials, or those who are trying to secure them.

To avoid Allison's ultimate catastrophe, we must commit to comprehensive research for advanced technology to keep us safe if one such device somehow reaches our shores.


Charles E. Schumer is the senior senator from New York




 

 

 

 

 

 
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
John F. Kennedy School of Government
79 JFK St., Cambridge, MA 02138
Tel. 617-495-1400 Fax. 617-495-8963
Please send technical questions and comments to bcsia_ksg@harvard.edu
2004 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College
GIS application development by
   
Blast Maps | FAQs | Bio | About | Links | Contact | Home